Lions/Jaguars Trade APPROVED

[firedup24]

Lions - firedup24 ($18.5-- cap space, $210K-- cap penalty)
Draft Picks to be traded - 2018 2nd round, (49th overall), 2018 4th round, (113th overall), 2018 5th round, (145th overall).

Jaguars - BigTexas18 ($16.3--cap space, $1.73-- cap penalty)
Allen Hurns, WR, 26, 88 OVR, 3 years remaining, Remaining salary 2018-$5.2 mil, 2019-$5.2 mil, 2020-$7.19mil, $2.4 mil cap penalty.
Draft Pick to be traded - 2018 4th round, (123rd overall).

majesty95 BigTexas18 pack1797 NightHawkTH32 JerseyBorn

 

[pack1797]

This trade has a lot of moving parts, so I apologize for my delay in getting back. I think Hearns, with three years left and at only 25 years old is worth the second and fifth. I'm not positive the value carries over enough for the jags to also move up 10 places in the 4th, but it's close. Gun to my head, I'd vote yes here because I don't see a big enough value gap to vote no. I'd like to hear from others as well though. Interesting trade to be sure.

 

[majesty95]

You can only trade three assets in one trade. I'd recommend just removing the 4th rounders. I'd approve the 2nd and 5th for Hurns although I would love for him to stay in the AFC lol

 

[firedup24]

I didn't see the rule about three assets. I did read that we are only allowed to trade 5 assets in a season, with assets being defined as players or 1st round picks. 2nd through 7th unlimited. This led me to believe this trade would be within league trading guidelines.

 

[JerseyBorn]

Similar to what Pack said, I agree that the 2nd and 5th is good for Hurns but I don't know if value gap on the swapping of the 4th rounders is enough to vote no. I didn't realize this was against any trade rules though but I'd vote yes on removing the 4th rounders like Majesty suggested as well.

 

[NightHawkTH32]

I'll vote yes on the 2nd and 5th for Hurns but like Maj said I hate him coming to the NFC but I dont play you next year lol.

 

[majesty95]

Nevermind, its three picks. I thought it was 4. Madden prohibits more than 3 assets per side in a deal. Its close enough. I'll vote yes.

 

[BigTexas18]

So correct me if I'm wrong. It looks like pack1797 says it's close enough, and after looking at it again majesty95 votes yes on original and says its close enough. However, JerseyBorn and NightHawkTH32 both vote for a 2nd and 5th.

Which leaves 2 yes on original and 2 yes on 2nd and 5th. Where does that leave us? lol

 

[BigTexas18]

Draft will be upon us shortly. Just want a ruling to this trade so we can Plan our draft accordingly lol

 

[JerseyBorn]

I was fine with both trades. I vote yes on the original.

 

[NightHawkTH32]

I wasn't voting based on the rule violation but since there isn't one as majesty pointed out. I vote yes.

 

[pack1797]

I also vote yes to the original.

 

[pack1797]

That's 4 yes votes. You may process it in game.